If you're new to polyamory then this site offers an introduction that will be indispensable. It begins by providing a refined definition based on historical evidence and critical thinking. This is important because bias often plays a significant role in how people look at polyamory, making those unfamiliar with it vulnerable to the self-serving interpretations of others.
It also dispels some of the common misconceptions, outlines some of the benefits and provides some reasons for caution. By taking the time to review this site you will be much better equipped to fair-mindedly discuss polyamory, identify true poly relationships, and engage in a poly lifestyle on your own terms from a well informed perspective.
Those already familiar with polyamory may find some portions contentious. Whatever the case, you are encouraged to share your experiences, questions, constructive criticism, and concerns. Info that helps improve the site will be added as time permits. For further details see the Contact Page.
The word "Polyamory" is a derivative of the term poly-amorous, coined by Morning Glory Zell-Ravenheart who used it in an article that appeared in the May 1990 edition of Green Egg, a periodical of the Church of All Worlds, an American Neopagan religion. She later drafted the following definition:
Polyamory is the practice, state or ability of having more than one sexual loving relationship at the same time, with the full knowledge and consent of all partners involved.TOP
Since 1990, multiple definitions and interpretations have popped-up that have led to various versions of polyamory, each with their own ethical considerations. So which one are we supposed to reference as a baseline? In clarifying the concept of polyamory, the Ravenhearts say the following:
"The two essential ingredients of the concept of polyamory are 'more than one;' and 'loving.' That is, it is expected that the people in such relationships have a loving emotional bond, are involved in each other's lives multi-dimensionally, and care for each other. This term is not intended to apply to merely casual recreational sex, anonymous orgies, one-night stands, pick-ups, prostitution, “cheating,” serial monogamy, or the popular definition of swinging as 'mate-swapping' parties."
Given the clarification above, the focus of polyamory is on establishing loving emotional bonds rather than engaging with multiple sex partners. Therefore some definitions have replaced the phrase "sexual loving" with the word "romantic". This is more in harmony with the original intent because the word "romantic" implies and permits, but neither necessitates nor emphasizes sex.
Another issue with the early definition is that it requires the consent of all partners involved. Before elaborating, it should be emphasized that basic consent, as in the individual right of everyone to refuse the advances of others, is taken for granted.
The kind of consent we're talking about here is where partners in a relationship require consent from each other before they can either be polyamorous, participate in a relationship outside the relationship they are already in, or bring someone new into the existing relationship.
That sort of consent is problematic because as outlined on the Nature Versus Nurture page, being polyamorous is innate. Therefore as individuals we're polyamorous whether we have consent or not. To quote the Ravenhearts on the freedoms polyamory brought into their lives:INSET 03
"As for 'what kind of freedoms' polyamory has brought into our lives, we would have to say, the freedom to be fully ourselves, according to our own intrinsic nature. And by our giving a name to it, other people who share that nature have also been finding that they are not alone."
Simply put, we love as we feel whether we have permission to do so or not, and therefore placing a requirement like consent on innate feelings and behavior limits our fundamental freedom and sets us up for problems associated with denial, which are in large part the same problems that polyamory aims to resolve.TOP
Removing the conditions of knowledge and consent from the fundamental definition of polyamory doesn't mean there's no practical value in having a set of behavioral guidelines that are in harmony with our poly nature, only that there's a fundamental difference in context between our poly nature and a poly relationship or lifestyle.
This is a recurring theme in discussions about a polyamory, and where the differences in context aren't well understood it can cause misinterpretations that assume ethical rules like consent don't apply, when they very well could. We certainly don't need anyone's consent to be poly, but arbitrarily bringing someone new into an existing relationship without the agreement of those already involved, could be seen as unfair.
Therefore, depending on the situation, requirements like "full knowledge and consent" may or may not be ethical. But no matter what, the concept of ethics is a key ingredient. So it makes more sense to simply replace specific examples like "full knowledge and consent" with the word "ethical", and in doing so cover all contingencies.TOP
For the same reasons as given in Inset 02 above, polyamory isn't simply ethical non-monogamy because hypothetically, sex with multiple partners outside the context of a meaningful relationship can still be entirely ethical.
Where then do we draw the line between polyamory and other types of ethical non-monogamy? As covered in greater detail on the Interrelationships page, the thing that consistently stands out is the interrelatedness of those involved.
For example the spectrum of swinging varies from superficial involvement to complex emotional involvement with multiple partners, but the degree of interrelatedness between those on the list may be negligible. However as soon as simultaneous romantic relationships attain a level of appreciable interrelatedness, there's no question that there's a shift from swinging into polyamory.TOP
Logically, if something is in a particular state, it must have the ability to be in such a state, and therefore in the original definition, the word "state" is redundant and can be dropped. There is also redundancy in the word "practice" because we practice things we learn, not what we are.
In other words we don't practice being human. We simply are human, and polyamory is an innate human ability. Likewise, simply practicing monogamy doesn't make a non-monogamous species like humans monogamous.
So when someone says they aren't polyamorous, it's not really accurate. What they really mean is that they don't embrace their poly nature, but instead practice monogamy or some other lifestyle that has to be learned through education or socialization.
There's also the contextual difference between adjectives and nouns. For example, when studying polyamory ( noun ) one discovers that there are several kinds of polyamorous ( adjective ) relationships.TOP
What we're left with are the key concepts of polyamory as a label for the innate ability to have more than one ethical romantic relationship at the same time. Hence the title of this site ( Poly Natural ), and in a relationship context as a set of interrelated ethical simultaneous romantic relationships. If we put this into the form of a definition we get:
This definition is in harmony with the core of all versions of polyamory I've run across, including the original, and therefore it forms the baseline on this site for the development of ethical views on a variety of interpretations and situations that people who are interested in polyamory may encounter.
💡 This definition and the entire explanation may be freely reproduced provided a backlink or source credit is included.TOP
For convenience we'll also be using the terms "poly" and "mono" as references to polyamorous and monogamous subject matter or people. Poly people are those who recognize and embrace their poly nature. They are also typically aware of the main differences between mono and poly relationships and have put a substantial amount of thought into what a relationship means to them on a number of levels.
Mono people are those who practice a mono lifestyle. Some mono people might recognize that they are poly by nature, but choose not to embrace it out of cultural convenience. Most however, seem to be unaware of their poly nature or the term polyamory, which means they haven't given much thought to it. Only when faced with the problems associated with a mono lifestyle do they begin to ask questions.